Talk:"Thumbnails" container
From TrainzOnline
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: I don't think the usage of these thumbnails images is very clear. Is the size of the image dictating where it is used? And what is the relevance, if any, of the 0,1,2, etc positions in t...) |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't think the usage of these thumbnails images is very clear. Is the size of the image dictating where it is used? And what is the relevance, if any, of the 0,1,2, etc positions in the container. Does the number indicate where the icon is to be used? --[[User:pcas1986|pcas1986]] 02:15, 20 September 2011 (UTC) | I don't think the usage of these thumbnails images is very clear. Is the size of the image dictating where it is used? And what is the relevance, if any, of the 0,1,2, etc positions in the container. Does the number indicate where the icon is to be used? --[[User:pcas1986|pcas1986]] 02:15, 20 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | : I have to agree, this is 'muddy waters', I can infer, only because I saw one example long ago the {identifier_ordinal: 0,1,2} is just an index of sorts, but the page would be clearer with an second example. If my conjecture is correct, something like: | ||
| + | |||
| + | thumbnails | ||
| + | { | ||
| + | 0 | ||
| + | { | ||
| + | width 32 | ||
| + | height 32 | ||
| + | image "thumbnail-32.texture" | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | 1 | ||
| + | { | ||
| + | width 512 | ||
| + | height 512 | ||
| + | image "thumbnail-512.jpg" | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | :Would be correct, and as stated, the software will use the one closest in size to the displaying module. So what's the correct scoop? //Fabartus 21:45, 7 June 2013 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | By --[[User:Pcas1986|pcas1986]] ([[User talk:Pcas1986|talk]]) 07:11, 10 June 2013 (EST) | ||
| + | The page does say that the size of the image basically dictates its usage. I have added part of the response I received from Chris on the container numbers. Basically they are just an identifier and have no particular meaning. i.e. container 0 doesn't mean it is a thumbnail or any other particular image type. | ||
| + | I may update the sample after finding a valid multi container example. | ||
Latest revision as of 07:11, 10 June 2013
I don't think the usage of these thumbnails images is very clear. Is the size of the image dictating where it is used? And what is the relevance, if any, of the 0,1,2, etc positions in the container. Does the number indicate where the icon is to be used? --pcas1986 02:15, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have to agree, this is 'muddy waters', I can infer, only because I saw one example long ago the {identifier_ordinal: 0,1,2} is just an index of sorts, but the page would be clearer with an second example. If my conjecture is correct, something like:
thumbnails
{
0
{
width 32
height 32
image "thumbnail-32.texture"
}
1
{
width 512
height 512
image "thumbnail-512.jpg"
}
}
- Would be correct, and as stated, the software will use the one closest in size to the displaying module. So what's the correct scoop? //Fabartus 21:45, 7 June 2013 (EST)
By --pcas1986 (talk) 07:11, 10 June 2013 (EST)
The page does say that the size of the image basically dictates its usage. I have added part of the response I received from Chris on the container numbers. Basically they are just an identifier and have no particular meaning. i.e. container 0 doesn't mean it is a thumbnail or any other particular image type.
I may update the sample after finding a valid multi container example.
